Event Date: 09/30/2019 (2:00 pm EDT - 3:00 pm EDT)
Diversity is a critical issue for organizations. A survey by Korn/Ferry International found that more than 2 million people leave their jobs each year because of unfairness in the workplace. The hiring costs which result from high turnover are a huge stumbling block to company success, not to mention the time investment that goes into screening applicants and acclimating new hires to their role. Still, the greatest hindrance to progression lies within the heart of the issue – that is, to devalue and exclude employees because they are different is to also place limitations on their contributions and ability to grow.
At its best, diversity is a business strategy that has been shown to increase an organization’s ability to achieve better bottom-line performance and sustain its growth and prosperity. It’s most effective when it’s focused on increasing opportunity for personal and organizational achievement – not on inaccurate beliefs about legalities, obligations and rules.
This webinar is based upon research from Appreciating Diversity, a training program that gives both newly emerging and experienced leaders and managers the tools and techniques for developing and refining their skills. This learning resource will help your organization retain employees and clients, make better decisions, and improve performance. Learn more about Appreciating Diversity at HRDQ.
Participants Will Learn:
- Why diversity is important.
- Understand the subtle ways that bias occurs.
- Identify instances of devaluing others through small, subconscious behaviors and micro-inequities.
- Establish a framework to increase inclusion at the organizational level.
- Recognize different ways of conveying respect.
- Address conflict productively and respectfully.
- Lead by example and be part of the solution.
Who Should Attend:
- Training and HR professionals
- Independent consultants
- Managers delivering training
With 15 years experience, Keera Godfrey, MBA, M.S. is a change management and training consultant helping organizations connect, build, and invest in their greatest assets—people. Whether reengineering business processes, implementing a new information system, or augmenting staff, taking care of people is critical to success. In 2010, Keera founded Naris Communications, a company that specializes in designing training programs, developing stakeholder communications, and delivering leadership training to support organizational transformation, performance improvement, and information system implementations.
Sarah: Hello everybody and welcome to today’s Webinar, why does diversity matter? Hosted by HRDQ-U and presented by Keera Godfrey. My name is Sarah and I will moderate today’s webinar. The webinar will last about an hour. If you have any questions, you can type them into the chat area in your GoToWebinar control panel, and then we’ll either answer them as they come in if we can, or after the session by email. Today’s webinar content is from our reproducible training library, the title appreciating diversity. If you’re interested in delivering this training within your organization, please contact HRDQ. Our presenter today is Keera Godfrey. With 15 years experience, Keera is a change management and training consultant helping organizations connect, build, and invest in their greatest assets, people. Whether re-engineering business processes, implementing a new information system or augmenting staff, taking care of people is critical to success. In 2010, Keera founded Naris communications, a company that specializes in designing training programs, developing stakeholder communications and delivering leadership training to support organizational transformation, performance improvement and information system implementations. Welcome Keera, and thank you so much for joining us today.
Keera Godfrey: Thank you so much Sarah, and hello everyone. I am so excited to be with you today. As Sarah mentioned, I’m Keera Godfrey, and I will be your facilitator for today’s webinar entitled, why does diversity matter? This is an interactive session as we will be using the polling feature as well as the chat room. I hope you had your afternoon coffee and you’re ready for some fun, lets’ get started. A survey by Korn Ferry International found that more than two million people leave their jobs each year because of unfairness in the workplace, costing employers an estimated $64 billion a year in hiring costs. I want to share with you a few concepts about diversity that should help you on your journey as you determine how to approach diversity awareness and diversity training at your organization. Here’s our agenda for today. We’ll talk about why is diversity awareness important, we’ll also talk about behaviors that create the separation. Specifically, we’ll talk about bias and stereotyping.
Keera Godfrey: And then also, we will talk about how to foster a culture of inclusion at the organizational level as well as at the individual level. Then we’ll also talk about the concept of leading by example, and then we will also give you a moment to jot down a few questions in the chat. Let’s begin with a definition of diversity. So what exactly is diversity? Diversity is simply the condition of having or being composed of different elements. When we talk about that, we usually think about variety. It’s also an inclusion of different types of people, such as people of different races or cultures, and in group or organization programs, programs intended to promote inclusion and diverse ideas. And I want you to pay close attention when we talk about diversity, this definition of inclusion of different types of people. And we see here that we only mentioned races and culture.
Keera Godfrey: Now, that we have a sense of what is diversity, less talk about why is diversity awareness important? Diversity awareness is a business strategy that has been shown to increase an organization’s ability to achieve better bottom line performance and sustain its growth and prosperity. It is most effective when it’s focused on increasing opportunity for personal and organizational achievement. According to a McKinsey study, racially diverse companies outperform others by 35%. Millennials view cognitive diversity as a necessity. It’s a necessary element in innovation, and are 71% more likely to focus on teamwork. So in fact, millennials expect adversity. 83% of millennials are actively engaged when they believe their organization fosters an inclusive culture compared to only 60% of millennials who are actively engaged when their organization does not foster an inclusive culture. Research also suggests that having high levels of awareness before training can lead to more engagement in diversity related programs.
Keera Godfrey: So pre-training competence levels had a positive effect on both outcomes. In essence, more competent trainees expressed more interest in additional training and were more likely to attend voluntary sessions. Having a diversity awareness before the training is very important and can be beneficial to your organization. So let’s talk about some of the sources of unfair treatment and differences among people in organizations. Why is this topic of diversity and inclusion so important in today’s society? Traditional diversity awareness programs have focused on the treatment of women and minorities. However, differences arise from a host of other traits as well as we can include age, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, physical abilities, educational background, whether someone has children or not. Even being an engineer versus being a salesperson can also create some unfair treatment.
Keera Godfrey: These trace or profiles cause people to make inaccurate assumptions. It creates separation and, yes, treat people unfairly. The goal of diversity awareness is simply to promote an inclusive work environment. With this as our foundation, let’s go a little bit further and shed light on behaviors that create separation. And then we’ll move on to talk about some of the behaviors that foster inclusion. Whether knowing or unknowingly we all at one time or at another time, we have fallen prey to behaviors that creates separation. It is human nature. But let’s begin to expose some of these behaviors so we can make different choices when we are presented with these behaviors again.
Keera Godfrey: A study published by the American Sociological Association looked at 829 companies over a 30-year period. It found that diversity training had no positive effect in the average workplace. Researchers then at the University of Minnesota summarized the ASA’s findings, the American Sociological Association findings by saying in firms where training is mandatory or emphasizes the threat of lawsuits, training actually has negative impact on management diversity. And let’s talk about why, because I’m sure many of you are thinking, really? Yeah. Let’s talk about why that is the case.
Keera Godfrey: Here’s the reason, when people are divided into categories to demonstrate diversity, it reinforces the idea of categories or groups of people, and it also reinforces separation. In these cases, instead of changing people’s attitudes, diversity training solidifies them. It essentially showed you are a group, and you are a group, and you are a group. In doing that, historically, when we see in cases such as affirmative action cases, they were put in place to compensate for pervasive and intense discrimination that prevented women and minorities from succeeding in the workplace. As a result, the emphasis was on integrating groups of people into that white male dominated workplace. Today, although people don’t want to be discriminated against, most also don’t want to be labeled as a certain type or a certain group. And we preferred to be treated as an individual. So many times the training of the past in diversity group people and they highlighted the differences. And so we’re saying here that creating that awareness had the opposite effect in terms of bringing people together.
Keera Godfrey: Also here, the bottom line is that diversity is not about just integrating people, which effectively involves pointing out specific groups of people. But it’s about cultivating meaningful relationships, interacting with others in a way that is respectful and genuine regardless of their type. So regardless of the group when you’re looking at the individual. The solution is to teach people how to treat each person as an individual, how to communicate and resolve conflict with anyone and also how to resist the urge to compare others to yourself saying, this person is like me or this group is like me, is just talking more about inclusion.
Keera Godfrey: Like I said before, it is truly human nature to be biased. When we talk about bias here, we’re talking about a prejudice in favor of or against one thing, a thing, a person, a group compared to another. And it’s usually in a way that’s considered to be unfair. Bias becomes unproductive when we allow it to control our decision making without questioning our assumptions. Rather than thinking we can eliminate all our biases, a better approach I would like to suggest is that we make conscious efforts to address them by questioning the validity of our assumptions and choosing behaviors that support fairness and equity. Using technology like AI to avoid unconscious bias. So bias related to demographics such as race, gender, age can be triggered by the information, even on a resume such as a candidate’s name and the dates they have held previous positions.
Keera Godfrey: And I’m sure many of you have seen that. In 2018, an AI adoption for diversity. When we look at AI and artificial intelligence is definitely one of the hot topics up today, but it can be programmed to avoid this unconscious bias by ignoring certain demographic information when sourcing candidates or screening resumes. Furthermore, as we look at, even in the technology like AI, it can be tested for bias by checking for demographic breakdowns on the applicants and during the sourcing and screening process.
Keera Godfrey: I want to introduce also another concept called on the fundamental attribution error. This is an error that occurs when we explain someone’s behavior based on the personality trait rather than external circumstances. Here’s an example. You pass a colleague in the hallway and you say hello, but the other person doesn’t respond. So you think to yourself that she is rude or stuck up. But perhaps maybe that person just received some bad news and so they’re preoccupied with that information. And maybe she just didn’t hear you. Another common example is what you say to yourself about other drivers on the road. Usually if someone’s driving behavior irritates you, you say that person is a bad driver. What if that driver is from out of town and is struggling with directions? When we make these assumptions, we call this the fundamental attribution error. Let’s talk about how can we identify this in our behavior. If you ask yourself, do I make assumptions about others based on their profile, their gender, their age, their race, their religion, their occupation? Do I treat two or more employees the same because they share a similar characteristic?
Keera Godfrey: Do I attribute or attribute someone’s success or failure to an inherent trait? If you can answer yes to any of these questions, you may have made a fundamental attribution error. We all know that stereotyping where you group people by simplistic, often inaccurate generalizations is unproductive and can result in unfair treatment or discrimination. Recent research has found that people stereotype others in more subtle ways. A study completed by a psychologist at Princeton University found that stereotypes tend to be characterized in terms of warmth or lack or thereof, or competence or lack thereof. When we talk about warmth, warmth is defined as whether a person had positive or negative intentions. And then competence is defined as how effective a person, how effective they were at fulfilling those intentions. Stereotyping then, it tends to group people in these terms, and it is definitely unproductive.
Keera Godfrey: Let’s talk a little bit about the subtle stereotyping. A positive judgment in one’s dimension usually accompanied by a negative judgment in the other dimension. So that’s what it is when we talk about stereotyping is positive judgment in one dimension, and of course, the reverse side of that is having a negative judgment in another dimension. Obviously, when people’s perspectives, when they’re influenced by the warmth competent judgments, which may or may not be accurate. So these perspectives may have poor outcomes. Here’s an example, for example, the finance department in your organization may be stereotyped as high competence and low warmth. They do their job well, but they’re basically, you may feel like they’re not on your side. If that is the perspective in your organization, then they may have trouble finding people to mentor them and to help them grow in the organization because there’s this judgment there about who they are.
Keera Godfrey: Unfair treatment isn’t always in the form of blatant discrimination. In fact, it is more likely to occur in the form of small subconscious behaviors that result in creating this type of separation. Experiencing these behaviors on a regular basis cause the recipients of feel devalued. Mary Rowe, she’s a researcher at MIT, she coined the phrase micro inequities to describe this phenomenon. Let’s talk about a few examples of micro inequities. When you give feedback to one employee more frequently than others, that’s an example. When you’re always eating lunch with the same person or same group of people, that can be an example, as well as habitual seating arrangements in a meeting that don’t allow others to sit close to a leader. Assuming a female employee doesn’t want to work with a client requiring conference calls at odd hours because she is a new mother, just making that assumption on your own. That can be an example as well.
Keera Godfrey: In a company called Ernst & Young, they discovered micro inequities in how their firm assign jobs. In this case, women were assigned to nonprofit clients while men were assigned to the Fortune 500 companies, which in turn did affect promotions. That was an example of micro inequities. Here are a few practical examples of behaviors that can cause others to feel devalued. Not making direct eye contact when shaking someone’s hand or barging in on someone’s workspace without asking permission. Interrupting someone while they’re talking, neglecting to invite someone to a meeting, excluding someone from a group activity. It can even be as we look at this list, leaving someone out of a conversation. You’re standing there and someone else comes up and leaving them out of a conversation, that can make others feel devalued. Or consistently mispronouncing someone’s name, that happens a lot. And that can make somebody feel devalued when you can easily go to them and say, “Hey please, how do you pronounce your name? I’m just asking that question on the sidelines.” Relying on the same trusted colleagues for advice instead of seeking new perspectives, that can also make someone feel devalued.
Keera Godfrey: And you see here so far, we really talk about things, and hopefully as you’re listening, you’re thinking through like, yeah, I can see that or maybe I felt that way before. Let’s go a little bit further and talk about some of the antidotes and some of the things you can do. A positive judgment, when we talk about micro affirmations we’re talking about a positive judgment in someone’s dimension was usually accompanied by a negative one. But let’s talk about some things that we can do to alleviate that. Here are some examples, offering public and private recognition, that can help. Also by giving credit to others, delivering clear and consistent feedback, that also can be a factor that can help deal with those micro inequities. Again, as you see, these are very small acts, things you can do to help other succeed and feel valued. Soliciting opinions and input, greeting everyone, asking questions and listening carefully.
Keera Godfrey: Having lunch with someone, someone different, someone new. Mixing up the seating arrangements during a meeting. And then also, connecting on a personal level. Those are definitely things you can do to help others succeed and feel more valued. Throughout this, I told you that it’s going to be an interactive session. Now, let’s take a minute here to use the polling feature to test your knowledge. We talked about subtle stereotyping tends to be characterized, and how it’s characterized and what is it. Here is the question, subtle stereotyping tends to be characterized by which of the following two traits? A, intelligence and skill, B, personality and sense of humor, C, warmth and competence, or D, work ethic and sincerity. Go ahead and use the polling feature that popped up to answer the question.
Keera Godfrey: All right. Okay. So let’s see. What’s the right answer? I see 74% had C, let’s see if that’s correct. And you are correct. Yes, rhe answer is C. Remember that warmth is defined by whether a person had a positive or negative intentions, and then also the competence was defined by how effective a person was at fulfilling those intentions. So that’s the subtle stereotyping. Wonderful, all right, let’s move on. Let’s talk about then, now, that we have an idea of the behaviors that can cause this separation, let’s move further and talk about how to foster this culture of inclusion. Again, not focusing on the different groups, but now we’re focusing on inclusion. Let’s move on here. Diversity awareness in the workplace has evolved from focusing solely on eliminating discrimination to proactively seeking this inclusion. So that is valuing each employee for his or her unique contributions to the organization and creating framework for inclusion begins with the organizational culture.
Keera Godfrey: What I’m going to through is to talk to you then about some of the framework for this organizational inclusion. I want to talk about to give you an activity and then also just go through an example of that. One of the activities can be to demonstrate a desire to seek diverse perspectives at all levels. An example of that you can do is switching positions among employees at various levels for half a day to see what new perspectives they can bring to that position. That’s something definitely you can do. Also, find the unique skills of each individual and capitalize on them. An example can be allow employees to contribute outside their regular job responsibilities. Another thing you can do is establish a buddy system that connects each new employee with a veteran employee, what we call, you show them the ropes.
Keera Godfrey: And in doing this, an example can be a share insights about the organizational culture and norms, be a point of contact for questions. So the veteran employee can be a point of contact for questions or even soliciting feedback on their experience as a new employee. So having this dialogue between the new employee and the veteran employee through this buddy system. Again, these are great ways at the organizational level, how you can approach inclusion. Also, here are a few more, find a non bureaucratic way to challenge the status quo. When I say non bureaucratic, I’m referring to ways that you don’t have to go through many channels within the organization to get permission, so these are simple ways. And one thing that you can do is encourage all employees to make a small change in their work routine.
Keera Godfrey: Another example or another activity is to foster an atmosphere of flexibility and learning. And I love this one because an example of this one can just be simply to have a teach your boss day where employees teach their bosses something new that their bosses did not know. And you can do this either through a lunch and learn session or just really informal. Also, I love this other one too because we don’t do this many times in a lot of organizations, which is being willing to admit mistakes and weaknesses and vulnerabilities. A wonderful way to do this is to maybe to schedule monthly gatherings to award a mistake of the month where employees compete by sharing the mistake they made and how they fixed it or how they will avoid it in the future. Again, this is a wonderful way of fostering organizational inclusion.
Keera Godfrey: I want to move on a little bit and talk about the work design, the workplace design, which is another way that you can foster this organizational inclusion. If you have the ability to influence the physical layout of your organization, I want to share with you just a few ways to foster a more inclusive environment so you can create a common space where employees can interact easily and informally. And I know many of the workplaces of today have this space. So if you don’t, please I encourage you to try to create that if you can, or consider larger tables in the break or lunch rooms where more people can mix at a time. That’s also very helpful. And also, here’s another example or another idea, you can consider needs of different populations and profiles. So maybe a space for nursing mothers or a few ergonomic adjustments for older employees. Those can be quite helpful as well as you look around and consider, hey, what can I do at an organizational level to foster a culture of inclusion?
Keera Godfrey: As we’ve said, diversity is ultimately about relationships. It’s up to every individual to help create and maintain an inclusive atmosphere. So it’s all of our responsibilities. I want to talk to you about some specific ways to do this. Here’s one way, take the time to get to know a new employee’s background. Find out about their work history, their experience, their education, their interests. Also, you can share your own background and experiences with others, especially with people who are different from you. Also, solicit different perspectives before making a decision that impacts your work unit. Asking others for their opinion.
Keera Godfrey: Also perhaps have lunch with or socialize with someone outside of your usual group. You can also actively seek to understand the viewpoint of someone who may disagree with you. And I know that may seem hard, but just again, having a conversation during lunch or, hey, let’s go to lunch, I see that we disagreed on a certain topic. I would like to understand why or understand a little bit deeper about your perspective. So having a conversation. Also adapt your communication or your working style to show you respect the person that you’re working with. And that can easily be in some cases where, I know in many workplaces you may have instant message either using Skype for business and someone loves to use the video. And there are many employees that don’t like that.
Keera Godfrey: Maybe you can look at, well, what do employees like? Or what does you colleague may not like? And making adjustments there, that’s really simple. And also, take the time to resolve a conflict so that both sides feel as if their needs are being met. Now, let’s talk quickly then about some employee behaviors that can contribute to this inclusion at the employee level. You can adapt to different working styles, approaches to communications and preferences for interacting. Again, like we’ve talked about, if there is an instance where you’re using instant message, but then there may be an employee that really likes face-to-face communication. Maybe you have a dinner celebration, but then there are employees who may have other obligations after work. So perhaps moving that to a lunch engagement instead.
Keera Godfrey: Communicating respectfully and effectively. These are individual ways that employees can make an adjustment because one person can make a difference. Also treating every person as a unique individual. Trying to encourage all coworkers to participate in informal and formal meetings. And on the manager level, here are some things you can do. You can also understand how personal preferences may affect the personnel decisions that you may have, such as who gets promoted or who gets assigned to the good projects. The bottom line here is just make fair HR decisions. Also, coaching and mentoring individuals who may be struggling to engage with others, manage employees individually. So getting to know their personalities, their unique skills, their interests and making decision based on employees in their individual skills and abilities, and matching that to the task requirements. In this case, we’re really talking about avoid assigning employees to projects just based on their age or their gender or their culture.
Keera Godfrey: Also, I want to talk a little bit about showing them respect. The dictionary defines respect as having due regard or feelings, wishes, rights or traditions of. Showing respect is perhaps one of the most, I would say, the vital components of maintaining an inclusive work environment. There are different ways to do that. Ad there’s also, when we look at direct versus indirect, some people prefer direct eye contact and straightforward conversations, and some people don’t. Also, when we look at time, time is a factor that some people believe that being on time shows respect and being late shows disrespect. Others believe people are more important than time and not to worry about being late for an appointment or a meeting if they’re spending time with someone. And I know many of you know people who feel that way.
Keera Godfrey: Here’s also, when we look at respect, we can look at it from an individual versus group. Some people value individual achievement and recognition while others value group achievement and group recognition. Those who may value then the group achievement may be unwilling to make a decision on their own because they feel that if they make a decision on their own, they’re disrespecting the rest of the group. Also, on the level of hierarchy, some people respect positions and status levels more than others. As a result, these people may not speak up around higher ups or people with higher level positions because they feel that it’s disrespectful to speak up or to challenge an opinion among those people. If the higher ups don’t share this value, then they may judge the employee negatively for not speaking up.
Keera Godfrey: So again, we were talking about these differences in how to show respect. But you can see where it can really depend on your organization. So really understanding your organization and having conversation about these different viewpoints on respect can prove helpful as you’re conducting your training on diversity. Let’s also talk about the reserve versus emotional. Some people believe that showing strong emotion signals a loss of control, and therefore they may lack respect for others who may do that. On the other hand, others believe that strong emotion show that you care and that you value and respect others enough to be open with them. You can see where they can easily become big conflict in the workplace just by your differences of opinion even when you talk about conveying a wonderful thing like respect.
Keera Godfrey: This is not one of the easiest thing. However, I do think that just by having conversations, this can become. It may not be comfortable, let’s put it that way. It may not be comfortable, but it is one of the easiest and most important ways to show respect to others. And here’s what we can do especially during that communication, listen carefully first and encourage others to share their opinion and their ideas. And when they’re doing that, don’t interrupt. Many times when you’re communicating with others and someone is talking, even though you’re listening, but sometimes you’re not listening, you’re just waiting for a pause so you can say what you want to say. Or you’re listing because you’re just like, oh, I’m ready to say something, oh, I want to have a rebuttal to what they’re saying. But try not to interrupt and truly listen to what they’re saying first.
Keera Godfrey: And then also you can adjust your style to match the other person’s preferences. The best way to find out someone’s preference is by simply asking them, what is the best way? I want to communicate with you, I want to share ideas, I want to hear your ideas, what is the best way that I can do that? What’s your preference? And that’s simply by asking a question. Consider what to say. Whatever you say, it should be true, it should be necessary, and it should be helpful. If you put whatever you’re gonna say through those filters, you should be okay. Never insult others, avoid nitpicking, criticizing insignificant things or things that don’t really matter or a voice sounding demeaning or judgmental when you’re speaking. And again, we’re talking about how you communicate with respect. And these are things again that foster this inclusive culture.
Keera Godfrey: You’ve heard it before, conflict is inevitable. And it is true. This is especially true in a diverse environment where employees have different values, different work styles, different preferences for communicating. Like we just talked about, different ideas of what respect is. Also, employees tend to have different ways of dealing with or avoiding conflict. It’s important to address conflict, especially in a way that is respectful as well as in a way that in some cases resolve the conflict. Let’s talk a little bit about laying this groundwork. Successful and respectful conflict resolutions, it requires you to do something simple like acknowledge that diversity related issues may be contributing to the conflict itself. And also, admitting or once you admit to that, then now you’re looking for ways of how can you discuss the issue with the person, and also determine how you both perceive it.
Keera Godfrey: So again, having these type of conversations and laying the groundwork. Also, ask is the issue a conflict? What feels like a tense conflict to one person may feel like an animated discussion to another person. Sometimes I’m sure you’ve seen people talking and you’re like, oh my goodness, they’re arguing. But no, they’re just having a animated discussion. It may be somebody who just move their hands a lot or you have people you may know, even in your family that they just speak loud. And you think, oh my goodness, are they angry? No, they just speak loud. Making sure that what you may perceive to be a conflict is really a conflict. Again, more of talking about laying the groundwork, acting in good faith, believe that the other person wants a positive, productive outcome as much as you do.
Keera Godfrey: So you’re going into a situation just believing the best, believing the best of the other person. Share your observations with an attitude of openness and curiosity. For example, instead of saying, why did you take credit for an idea? You can say something like, you have good ideas on your own, that’s why it surprised me that you shared my idea with the team as if it was yours. There is a certain way to frame the information that may be better received. Also, it’s a good idea to separate substantive issues from just style differences. This is where differences in how people approach conflict show up. For example, some people focus on the facts while others value discussing their feelings about an issue. And that’s a different approach to how conflict may arise, and how it can be also dealt with.
Keera Godfrey: Decide how to approach the conflict resolution process. And you can do this together, you can also maybe try to have a third party mediator if necessary. Again, when we look at laying the groundwork and we look at inclusion and diversity, we’re also talking about how to deal with the inevitable conflicts that may exist. Also, consider these possible causes. Maybe it’s the absence of information or if somebody has been misinformed. Maybe there’s just a power struggle or you may work in a stressful environment. And that can simply cause conflict on his own. There may be incompatible goals where someone on a team is trying to achieve something else and another person had a different interpretation of what the goal was.
Keera Godfrey: Identify the needs of each side, asking like, what do I want? What does the other person want? What do we need in order to get to a solution? Or just simply, where do we have common ground? That’s a great way to start when you’re dealing with conflict. And also, consider just achieving a disagreement. And in many cases, we call this, sometimes you just agree to disagree. We agree that we disagree on this issue right here. And sometimes that can also be a great way to resolve conflict just by agreeing to disagree. I know we covered a lot, and so let’s do this. Let’s take another moment for, let’s test your knowledge here.
Keera Godfrey: So which of the following is an effective way to convey respect to others? A, offer recognition for both individual and group achievement, B, always make direct contact so others don’t feel like you’re avoiding them, C, insist that everyone is always on time because being late is a sign of disrespect, or is it D, always show lots of emotions so people know you are enthused. So which one is it? Which of the following is an effective way to convey respect for others?
Keera Godfrey: Okay. All right. Okay, let’s see which one? Now, 71% feels like it’s A. And okay, someone says D. Okay, let’s see, 1% has D. All right, let’s see the answer. The answer is A, to offer a recognition for both individual and group achievements. This is a great way to show respect for others. All right, let’s move on here. Let’s talk a little bit about leading by example. When we talk about leading by example here, sometimes in some situations you may have employees or even yourself, you may feel emotional as though you’re lacking control of your feelings because someone has offended you. And giving feedback on his or her behavior can be difficult. So at the same time, receiving feedback on the behavior you may have done or another colleague may have done can be just as difficult.
Keera Godfrey: So giving that information also being the recipient of the information can be difficult because our natural reaction is to be defensive or to become defensive. I would like to take the few moments we have together to talk about how to offer and then how to receive when you’re being confronted by a negative behavior that somebody has done to you or maybe you have done and somebody is confronting you about it. Let’s talk about how to give feedback. When you’re giving feedback, approach others directly. Don’t gossip or go behind their backs or go to another colleague and talk about it or constantly doing that. But really, go to the person directly, and you want to keep it simple and stick to the one issue at a time. If they did multiple things, then maybe just talk about one at a time though.
Keera Godfrey: And be sure to use words, the I statements. I’m sure many of you heard the I statements. And this is where you add a specific examples about how the behavior has offended you. You can start off, I felt, and whatever that feeling is, when. And of course here, we want to describe the behavior you would like instead. I felt whatever way when you did, and whatever they did. And then you describe, well, what is it that you would like to have experience instead? And then you check for understanding and see if they understood what you were trying to say. And so that’s a great way on how you can deliver or give feedback on someone’s behavior that may have offended you.
Keera Godfrey: On the other side, there is the other side of when you’re the person who is receiving this feedback. Try to be open and non-defensive about it because again, the person is sharing how they felt. This is how they perceived the action or the words that were spoken. You may want to ask for specific examples if none were given. Again, when you’re giving it, you say, when you did this, this is how I feel. And if the person doesn’t provide it in that context, then you can ask for a specific example. Accept the other person’s perception as real to them. In other words, don’t try to tell them that they are being sensitive or they shouldn’t feel that way, just trying to disqualify the feeling. They’re sharing with you how felt, and you should take it on as valid.
Keera Godfrey: Also, when you’re receiving this information, you can summarize what the other person said to show that you understood them accurately so you can pair it back to them just to make sure, hey, when I did this, you felt this certain way. And again, you’re saying it by not trying to discredit that feeling that they have. And then also what you can do is commit to engaging in behavior that they requested. So they’re sharing with you, this is what you did and here is the behavior that I would like. And then you’re going to give that commitment that, yes, I’ll do that, I’ll do that.
Keera Godfrey: With that, this is a short one, let’s test your knowledge. Which of the following is the best way to respond to someone who gives you feedback? A, accept that criticism, even if they don’t give any examples, B, be open and non-defensive, C, explain how they misunderstood you, D, tell them that they are too sensitive. Which of the following is the best way to respond to someone that gives you feedback? And this is the first time this has happened, 100% of the respondents said, 100% of you said B. And the correct answer is B, you want to be open and non-defensive when someone is giving you feedback. Excellent. I really hope this webinar provided insights about the importance of diversity and how you can bring diversity awareness to your organization. I just want to go over a quick summary of the things we covered here.
Keera Godfrey: These are your takeaways. Diversity is not about integration, which involves pointing out specific groups of people. But it’s about cultivating meaningful relationships, which is interacting with others in a way that is respectful and genuine regardless of their type. Establish your framework to increase inclusion at the organizational level. I gave you many examples. You can choose which one may fit your organization, so you want to establish this framework. Also, recognize different ways of conveying respect to others and knowing that there may be difference of opinion in terms of how respect is conveyed. Address conflict productively and respectfully. And also, lead by example, be a part of the solution and how feedback, and being able to demonstrate how to give feedback as well as how to receive feedback. This ends our session for today, thank you so much for joining me. And Sarah, I’ll turn it over to you.
Sarah: Wonderful, thank you so much Keera. That was great. We appreciate your looking to HRDQ for your training needs. We publish research based experiential learning products that you can deliver in your organization. So check out our online or print self-assessments. We have out of your seat games, our reproducible workshops that you can customize just like are appreciating diversity title, which is the foundation of today’s webinar. And we have lots more, so either check out our website or give our customer service team a call. They know our products really well and are happy to guide you through some options. And if you do need help learning a training program or you want one of our expert trainers like Keera to come onsite or virtually deliver it for you, we also provide those services. We look forward to being your soft skills training resource. So that’s all the time we have today. Thank you Keera for the dynamic presentation, and thank you everyone for participating in today’s webinar. Happy training.